SimonXIX’s avatarSimonXIX’s Twitter Archive—№ 44,504

  1. Reasons why libraries purchase expensive closed-source software that doesn't work for them:
    1. …in reply to @SimonXIX
      1. The tender process in UK HEIs lends itself to the existing vendor marketplace. It's not flexible enough to support homegrown solutions.
      1. …in reply to @SimonXIX
        2. The senior managers who did the tendering process didn't have enough technical knowledge to know what they were looking at / for.
        1. …in reply to @SimonXIX
          3. The vendor of the closed-source project that doesn't do what they want bought senior managers dinner and drinks at a conference.
          1. …in reply to @SimonXIX
            4. "We've always used [X] and it's easy to upgrade to [vendor]'s new product [Y]."
            1. …in reply to @SimonXIX
              5. Libraries don't employ staff who can do chunky tech stuff required for implementation projects: they have to rely on vendor support.
              1. …in reply to @SimonXIX
                6. Libraries just happen to have £70,000-£100,000 a year itching to be spent on licensing and support costs burning a hole in their budgets.
                1. …in reply to @SimonXIX
                  7. All of the other libraries in the city / area / country bought [X] so it must be a good piece of software.
                  1. …in reply to @SimonXIX
                    8. The decision was made outside the library, e.g. by ICT, by the Research Office, by the Registrar, etc. (thanks, @pennyb)
                    1. …in reply to @SimonXIX
                      9. The library would have to run such an extensive systems implementation as a project and don't have project management experience.
                      1. …in reply to @SimonXIX
                        10. The library would have to know about software development and don't have waterfall / Agile / etc. experience.
                        1. …in reply to @SimonXIX
                          11. Senior library managers didn't even know about open-source alternative [Q] because [Q] doesn't do big conferences or marketing.
                          1. …in reply to @SimonXIX
                            12. Even widely-used 'free' software in libraries is developed by people who choose not to license it as open-source (this one's a subtweet)
                            1. …in reply to @SimonXIX
                              1. …in reply to @SimonXIX
                                14. "The previous library director / assistant director / head of systems bought it and tied us into a 4-year contract."