-
Lots of replies saying that Starmer would appear weak if he said he wouldn't fire them and that the point of a deterrent is that he has to say that, yes, he would fire nukes. Wouldn't it be stronger then for him to go against the answer that he "has" to give? @PolitlcsUK/1797573818761822651
-
Clearly the media class think there is a correct answer to the question of whether he would be prepared to fire nuclear weapons. Isn't the stronger response to give the answer that they don't want to hear?
-
Call me a leftist contrarian but I'm less likely to look up to someone who explicitly says they would unleash nuclear hellfire on other human beings.