SimonXIX’s avatarSimonXIX’s Twitter Archive—№ 50,892

                    1. #OpenRepo2019 The problem of peer review is to accommodate open, blind, and double-blind peer reviews in repositories. Dom cites Nick Sheppard's 2017 work on enabling peer review in repositories.
                  1. …in reply to @SimonXIX
                    #OpenRepo2019 The Jisc Open Research Hub workflow tries to accommodate this and incorporate it into the processes of submission and ingest.
                1. …in reply to @SimonXIX
                  #OpenRepo2019 At the core of the JORH architecture is a messaging layer enabling communication between various layers, databases, and services within the application. Peer review maps on to this because the messaging and transit of communication is at the core.
              1. …in reply to @SimonXIX
                #OpenRepo2019 A central aim for COAR is making the next-gen repository invisible to the researcher: an invisible interface that produces 'flow' in the user and reduces barriers to use.
            1. …in reply to @SimonXIX
              #OpenRepo2019 Nielsen from Invenio says the low-hanging fruit is signposting. He, like Walk, highlights this as crucial for next-gen repository technologies. It enables machine processes to read pages and enables services like Unpaywall to get more data from HTML pages.
          1. …in reply to @SimonXIX
            #OpenRepo2019 Walk is talking about how there are important reasons for the global spread of repositories rather than centralising repository culture: one, it's a natural defence against monopolistic practices like those we see in library systems 👍👍👍
        1. …in reply to @SimonXIX
          #OpenRepo2019 Two, it enables deep customisations for non-homogenous deposits like with research data which will be a massive area of growth in repository culture. See the STEM / arts discussions from yesterday and the differences in those research 'outputs'.
      1. …in reply to @SimonXIX
        #OpenRepo2019 Very pleased that this speaker... walks the walk 😎 #besttweetoftheconference
    1. …in reply to @SimonXIX
      #OpenRepo2019 Scholix (scholix.org/) is highlighted as another important technology in extracting out citations and making them available.
  1. …in reply to @SimonXIX
    #OpenRepo2019 What are the next steps in implementing next-gen repositories in our communities? We need to see good examples of practice, we need to see roadmaps, we need to see adoptions of the technologies we've discussed.
    1. …in reply to @SimonXIX
      #OpenRepo2019 In mapping the future, COAR et al. deliberately have not prioritised the technologies or the behaviours because disparate non-homogenous repositories have different priorities and different customisations required.
      1. …in reply to @SimonXIX
        #OpenRepo2019 Annotations is potentially another important technology for repositories (and digital preservation systems). Jisc is well aware of this as part of their research into peer review processes.
        1. …in reply to @SimonXIX
          #OpenRepo2019 Walk: "If we left this to the marketplace, all our repositories would eventually be closed down and we'd end up with an Amazon for scholarly communications." YES.